Publisher: Electronic Arts
We tested the game using the 64-bit executable under and DirectX 10 with the 1.21 patch applied. We used a custom time demo recorded on the Harbour map which is more representative of gameplay than the built-in benchmark that renders things much faster than you're going to experience in game.
For our testing, we set all the settings to High. Because of how intense the game is, we tested without anti-aliasing or anisotropic filtering enabled, and at a resolution of 1,680 x 1,050. There is currently no support for anisotropic filtering in the game, but you can still force it from the driver control panel if you wish.
-
ASRock H55M Pro
-
Zotac H55-ITX WiFi
-
Asus P7H57D-V Evo
-
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2
-
Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H
-
ASRock P55 Extreme4
-
ASRock P55M Pro
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Asus P7H57D-V Evo
-
Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H
-
ASRock P55M Pro
-
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2
-
Zotac H55-ITX WiFi
-
ASRock P55 Extreme4
-
ASRock H55M Pro
Frames Per Second - higher is better
Read our
performance analysis.
Want to comment? Please log in.
Posted by memeroot - Fri Aug 27 2010 09:54
Posted by Cobalt - Fri Aug 27 2010 11:14
Posted by memeroot - Fri Aug 27 2010 11:47
my comment stated
"lame"
lets look at the definition
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/lame
"3. Weak and ineffectual; unsatisfactory"
hardly suitable to be overwritten by a mod which implies I wrote something rude or otherwise....
sure it was a brief remark - but heck the review could have been summarised by 'overclocking didnt work and not as good a board costing 30% less - link to scan selling other board)
BTW
that compare comments bit is cool!
Posted by [USRF]Obiwan - Fri Aug 27 2010 12:09
I have a AMD Extreme 3 board and love it. No problems with waking up from sleep at all. I find the performance of the Intel Extreme4 rather confusing. Especially the sata performance of the marvel. Must be something very wrong with the board bios or board design.